Timothy Revell

Executive Editor at New Scientist

United Kingdom
email-iconphone-icongithub-logolinkedin-logotwitter-logostackoverflow-logofacebook-logo
Join Prog.AI to see contacts
email-iconphone-icongithub-logolinkedin-logotwitter-logostackoverflow-logofacebook-logo
Join Prog.AI to see contacts

Summary

👤
Senior
🎓
Top School
Timothy Revell is an Executive Editor and seasoned science and technology journalist with 11 years’ experience breaking major stories and shaping editorial direction at New Scientist. With a PhD in mathematics and computer science and an MMath, he brings rare technical depth to coverage of AI, mind‑reading devices and mathematical applications, and he’s the author of a popular science book on contemporary mathematics. He has built and led teams—most recently launching New Scientist’s US bureau in New York—and previously ran Culture & Comment and Technology News sections. A skilled interviewer and presenter, he’s spoken with figures from David Attenborough to Kate Crawford and regularly hosts podcasts for New Scientist and the BBC. He also runs New Scientist’s diversity internship scheme, blending editorial leadership with talent development and public engagement.
code11 years of coding experience
job1 year of employment as a software developer
bookDoctor of Philosophy (PhD), Mathematics and Computer Science, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Mathematics and Computer Science at University of Strathclyde
bookMaster of Mathematics (MMath), Mathematics, First Class with Honours, Master of Mathematics (MMath), Mathematics, First Class with Honours at University of Bath
stackoverflow-logo

Stackoverflow

Stats
1reputation
0reached
0answers
0questions

Github contributions (1)

github-logo-circle
Contributions:40 commits, 22 pushes in 2 months
Find and Hire Top DevelopersWe’ve analyzed the programming source code of over 60 million software developers on GitHub and scored them by 50,000 skills. Sign-up on Prog,AI to search for software developers.
Request Free Trial
Timothy Revell - Executive Editor at New Scientist